The chant of change is all around us. For years, Latino (as used here, meaning men and women with ancestry from Spanish-speaking countries and residing permanently in the United States) students and alumni have lobbied for a Latino professor at Harvard Law School. They have longed for a professor who self-identifies as Latino, has first-hand knowledge of Latino life in the United States, and who openly supports the struggle for equality of the Latino community in this country. There are persons from all over the world who would self-identify or be identified by others with the ethnic Latino description.
But being Latino in the United States takes on a different meaning. It is about culture, ethnicity, life experiences, national origin, and self-identification. There is also the visual identification made by others based on the stereotypical "brown" Latino. The reality is that the "Latino label" in the United States includes persons of all races and many mixtures thereof.
Thanks to an ongoing dialogue over many years, the HLS administration and faculty should understand by now what Latino students and alumni mean by a Latino professor. I must admit that I was surprised not to find one at HLS. I just assumed that a law school with Harvard Law's resources would have a few.
Traditionally, arguments in support of bringing diverse faculty to the law school center on the benefits for minority students of studying under professors with similar backgrounds. But today we also recognize that all students benefit from learning in an environment that includes ethnic, racial, and gender diversity in positions of power. For some students, their first experiences with individuals of racially or ethnically diverse backgrounds, working on an equal footing as peers, take place in the higher education setting. In the law school setting, when law students interact with minority faculty in positions of power and prestige they become comfortable interfacing with minorities in this framework. These experiences serve to familiarize students with--what should be an expectation--the fact that they will encounter minority lawyers at all levels of the profession including as senior associates, partners, judges, and high-ranking government officials. For minority students, these interactions help to form their own professional identities by confirming that all career tracks in the legal profession are truly open to them, not only in theory but also in practice.
This is undeniably a year of firsts in the United States. Either an African-American Harvard Law alumnus or a woman from Yale Law will win the Democratic primary and move one step closer to obtaining the top job in the federal government. HLS is in a position to contribute to this movement of firsts by finally appointing a Latino, not as a visiting professor or fellow, but as a full member of the law school faculty. The days of protests, strikes, sit-ins, course boycotts, overt faculty wars, and messages on chalkboards, as described in Luz Herrera's article, "Challenging a Tradition of Exclusion: The History of an Unheard Story at Harvard Law School," published in the fifth volume of the Harvard Latino Law Review, seem to be distant historical anecdotes. But it was those expressions of activism by law students that helped, in large part, to bring African-American faculty to the law school. In addition, visionaries like former HLS Professor Derrick Bell, an African-American, who were committed to the cause, made professional sacrifices to pressure Harvard Law to move forward rather than remain stuck in a status quo that excluded people of color and women. The efforts have continued, including, as reported in The Record on December 8, 2005, students raising the need for a Latino professor during a visit by Nelson Castillo, then-president of the Hispanic National Bar Association.
Law students have also published articles in The Record to continue the dialogue about the need for a Latino professor, i.e., an article by Hugo Torres on March 13, 2003, and an article by Jose Morales and Lauren Schreiber in the April 19, 2007 edition. More recently, on November 20, 2007, members of La Alianza, including myself, met with Dean Kagan to discuss, among other things, the current efforts to bring a Latino professor to HLS.
As I get ready to leave Cambridge, I am optimistic that 2008 will be the year when Harvard Law finally introduces a Latino professor to the HLS community and law schools across the United States and the world. The old excuse that there is no Latino talent in the United States, including HLS alumni, with the credentials to teach here, is clearly inapplicable and should be considered insulting, disingenuous, and out of touch with reality. If NYU and Stanford are capable of attracting Latino scholars to their faculty, why wouldn't Dean Kagan and the HLS faculty be able to convince a Latino professor that he or she would be sincerely welcomed, respected, and included at Harvard Law?
As a leader in legal academia, HLS must not neglect its responsibility to send a signal to all law schools that diversity should not only be paid lip service, but that diversity must be promoted at all strata of the legal profession and society in general. To meet this goal, Harvard Law must recognize and act upon the need to appoint a Latino professor sooner rather than later. Under the leadership of Dean Kagan, HLS has managed to "poach" top faculty from fellow law schools. This proves that Dean Kagan is capable of making a historical appointment by bringing the first Latino professor(s) to Harvard Law. I am confident that she will get the job done. ¡Si se puede!
Maritza Reyes is an LLM.


My wife's father is hessaby as in www.hessaby.com (they stole his cash and put it there) and my mother-in-law family is related by marriage tot the Pakravans., who headed the SAVAKPan Am was nicknamed PanIran as the Shah's family was the largest shareholder. I have extreme amount of details of exactly was going on
from the Iranians wanting him to return their assets to other coup attempts to 6 months before the Shah son pretended he was bankrupt in a public trial, to my wifes relative coming to our house talking about the coup and we did not know they were in Washington DC, to the Iran Contra hearings trial that was going to start Feb 20 th, 1989 to the tipping of the coup to the Iranian govt, ,to something in writing I can prove the coup to the Salamon Rushtie Feb 14th insult to islam to get the people on the street to avoid the coup to the Iranian govt announcement of a coup by 'dissent mullahs' announced at the time to the negiotations between the Bush people involved pretending they were going to make a deal to the 'nice' stories plant in US newspapers at the time (including the Post) as part of the negotation to the fact the bomb had to placed out of London based on the flight path as I worked at USAir at the time creating the flight plans for the 'planes to fly themselves' to overt CIA agents around me at the time to the fact that Bollier, the guy who made the timer for the bomb's wide was IRANIAN and the Libyans told me and said they were not allowed to say... there were 3 witness only.. the main one was trashed.. Bollier and a guy whom said he soldm the Libyan a suitcase in Malta.. hence, one the suitcase guy would be left.. the Libyans did not put up a defence in exchange for evidence to trash the main witness on the stand to what an overt CIA agent told me in the US 4 years later.. etc. etc and the details of several coups to the new World bank (my wie's cousin involved who used to work at the work bank)and US loans starting May 1990 to Iran to the fact that PANAm was shut down 18 months later as they thought it would be targeted again because of the Shah connection (the US airlines go in and out of bankruptcy all the time - this was the one of the first US airlines - an ICON) etc
I also know where the Iranian govt officials have money in the US, Canada and UK; the back door dealing etccall me for details.. Barry Lanza 00 44 1786831554.. My father-in-law was a convicted spy given amnesty