Two Harvard Law students are about to embark on a legal experience that many lawyers wait years to have a shot at: a civil jury trial. Laura Ferry and Susan Rohol, both 3Ls, have been busy preparing for the upcoming trial, which begins today. As members of the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau, Ferry and Rohol were assigned a case that began as a simple eviction action. However, things quickly changed. "Before he [the client] moved out, we filed a number of counterclaims relating to the horrific conditions he was living in," says Ferry, "After he moved out, we transferred his counterclaims for damages to the civil docket - and requested a jury trial." After a series of delays and continuances, the four to five day trial is set to begin in the Jury of Six Session at the Cambridge District Court in order to determine whether the plaintiff is owed damages for living under such conditions, assuming it does not settle before trial.
"We originally took on this case because our client was in such a miserable living situation and had clearly been exploited by his landlord," says Rohol. The client lived in an overcrowded apartment where housing violations were abundant: roach infestation, debris in the backyard, asbestos in the basement, and lack of heat and hot water during winter were among the terrible circumstances the client had to endure.
The case is a unique one for the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau, which traditionally handles cases for indigent clients involving government benefits, housing issues, and family law. Although the Bureau's student-attorneys have handled many housing and eviction cases before, jury trials seeking damages are rare. To prepare for the trial, Ferry and Rohol have had to document the housing violations, prepare witnesses, draft jury instructions, and chart a trial strategy with their supervising attorney, Lee Goldstein.
Authorized under Massachusetts law to practice law so long as they are supervised by a licensed attorney, Bureau members must nonetheless juggle their work responsibilities with their lives as students. Since jury trials are time consuming even for experienced attorneys, Ferry and Rohol received help from other Bureau members. "The Bureau has also been an amazing environment to be in while preparing for something of this magnitude," says Ferry, "Everyone is so supportive and so helpful." Ferry and Rohol note that other Bureau members who have helped on the case include Amy Lawler, a 2L who assisted in preparing jury instructions and voir dire; Tim Syrett, 3L, who helped draft a pre-trial motion and a memo of law; James Gignac, 3L, who helped prepare charts and diagrams; and Kristen Nelson, 3L, who volunteered to drive Ferry and Rohol to the Bureau and to court with their large quantity of exhibits and documents.
"The really incredible thing about this experience is that we have had true ownership of the case since we took over," says Rohol. Rohol is pleased to have the opportunity: "Only at the Bureau would you be able to have so much control over the direction you want the case to go in," notes Rohol, "and only at the Bureau would you have an opportunity to work in such close contact with your client and with the many expert witnesses being called in this case."


My wife's father is hessaby as in www.hessaby.com (they stole his cash and put it there) and my mother-in-law family is related by marriage tot the Pakravans., who headed the SAVAKPan Am was nicknamed PanIran as the Shah's family was the largest shareholder. I have extreme amount of details of exactly was going on
from the Iranians wanting him to return their assets to other coup attempts to 6 months before the Shah son pretended he was bankrupt in a public trial, to my wifes relative coming to our house talking about the coup and we did not know they were in Washington DC, to the Iran Contra hearings trial that was going to start Feb 20 th, 1989 to the tipping of the coup to the Iranian govt, ,to something in writing I can prove the coup to the Salamon Rushtie Feb 14th insult to islam to get the people on the street to avoid the coup to the Iranian govt announcement of a coup by 'dissent mullahs' announced at the time to the negiotations between the Bush people involved pretending they were going to make a deal to the 'nice' stories plant in US newspapers at the time (including the Post) as part of the negotation to the fact the bomb had to placed out of London based on the flight path as I worked at USAir at the time creating the flight plans for the 'planes to fly themselves' to overt CIA agents around me at the time to the fact that Bollier, the guy who made the timer for the bomb's wide was IRANIAN and the Libyans told me and said they were not allowed to say... there were 3 witness only.. the main one was trashed.. Bollier and a guy whom said he soldm the Libyan a suitcase in Malta.. hence, one the suitcase guy would be left.. the Libyans did not put up a defence in exchange for evidence to trash the main witness on the stand to what an overt CIA agent told me in the US 4 years later.. etc. etc and the details of several coups to the new World bank (my wie's cousin involved who used to work at the work bank)and US loans starting May 1990 to Iran to the fact that PANAm was shut down 18 months later as they thought it would be targeted again because of the Shah connection (the US airlines go in and out of bankruptcy all the time - this was the one of the first US airlines - an ICON) etc
I also know where the Iranian govt officials have money in the US, Canada and UK; the back door dealing etccall me for details.. Barry Lanza 00 44 1786831554.. My father-in-law was a convicted spy given amnesty